chary1202 wrote:thanq very much for replies and suggestions
I m refused today. plz help
reason for the refusal is given below--
you have provided a bank letter from dutch bangla bank
limited, a statement also, a declaration letter and a
validation letter as evidence for third party funding by
mr md nurul huda.
the letter from dutch bangla bank limited dated 27
november 2012 in the name of mr md nurul huda does not (as
required by the immigration rules):
1) name mr md lutfor rahaman (the appellant)
2) state the contact details of the third party
the third party declaration relating to md nurul huda does
not (as required by the immigration rules):
1) contain the appellant's signature.
2) consequently, the legal document relating to mr md
nurul huda does not confirm the validity of the
appellant's signature because the applicant has not signed
the third party declaration.
the letter from dutch bangla bank limited dated 12
december 2012 in the name of mr md intaz ali mollik does
not (as required by the immigration rules):
1) name the appellant
2) state the contact details of the third party (mr md
intaz ali mollik)
the third party declaration relating to mr md intaz ali
mollik does not (as required by the immigration rules):
1) contain the appellant's signature.
2) consequently, the legal document relating to mr md
intaz ali mollik does not confirm the validity of the
appellant's signature because the applicant has not signed
the third party declaration.
in line with paragraph 245DD(I) of the immigration rules,
we have not carried out an assessment as detailed in
paragraph 245DD(h) of the immigration reles as you
application has been refused. we reserve the right to
carry out this assessment in any challenge of this
decision of the future application for fier 1
(enterprenur).
as a result of the above you have not demonstrated that
you meet the requirments of the rules to be awarded points
under provision (d) in the first row of table 4 of
appendix A.
