- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Sorry to hear this. Very strange. Can you please give details of hearing day? By what argument HO representative came to conclusion that evidential flexibility doesn't apply?kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.
kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.
Sorry to hear that. If they (HO) insist that no flexibility applied then I think re-apply is best suit for you. Reason that the advertisement content is managed by the applicant... and can not say that it can not do as requirement like the bank statements.kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.
Guru, as there is substantial changes in the flexibility policies, can you please comment on whether the presenting officer's argument will hold water.rehan01 wrote:HO representative's conclusion was that it evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case and what was your solicitor conclusion or arguments against it ?
regards
kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.
Guru, as there is substantial changes in the flexibility policies, can you please comment on whether the presenting officer's argument will hold water.rehan01 wrote:HO representative's conclusion was that it evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case and what was your solicitor conclusion or arguments against it ?
regards
kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.
Dear mate I also refuse same reason . Please tell me what action u show in court what argument present ur representive?kau wrote:Hi Guys,
My visa was refused because my name was not on the advertising material. Has anyone successfully appealed this decision? I had my hearing today and the HO representatives's conclusion is that the evidence flexibility policy does not apply in this case.