I got my approval before a week. I applied for my fiance too on same day with same set of docuements.
But it was refused
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
claimed period : March 2006 - April 2007 , points claimed : 25
Note : October & november 2006 payslips was not submitted since she shifted her company.
Reason for refusal : She cant claim for march & april 2006 since its falling outside 12 month period.hence awarded only 20.(total 70)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
My Doubts :
1) I hope we can claim any 12 month out of 15 month period , how can they say its not in 12 month period? Is this a mistake from HO's understanding?
2) They din refuse stating that 12 month claim is not continous(break in company) , but the reason stated was its out of 12 month period. its confusing what was exact reason for refusal?
3) I called the homeoffice & they din connect to HO stating tehy can answer this query & argued telling the claim should be continuous & not with a break.
Important note:
Her application was sent on May 30 , during that time HSMP guidance was 4.0 version which stated that
"We will assess your gross earnings before tax over a total period of up to 12 months out of the 15 months immediately prior to your application.
The earnings can be for any 12 month period out of the last 15 months."
But a new version HSMP guidance 5.0 was released on June 1 , which is stating "We will assess your gross earnings before tax over a total period of up to 12 months out of the 15 months immediately prior to your application. The earnings can be for any consecutive12-month period out of the last 15 months. There can be gaps in employment within this 12 month period"
I guess the HO would have used new version 5.0 & evaluated her application, by which it wil mostly get rejected. But as per her application the valid guidance they should refer is 4.0.
Can someone help me to do a review for her case? inputs are welcome.
Cheers
ikon