- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
http://www.immigrationboards.com/indefi ... 92886.htmlAlILR wrote:Dear all,
I have sent my amendments in July and now they are sitting with compliance.
IS there anyone else who in the same situation i.e. amendments with compliance. And did they gave any date when it will be dealt with?
HMRC aint updating any amendment beyond the 4 years time until January because of HMRC has got alerted of this sudden so many amendments request specifically 10/11 and they have escalate this issue to their top bosses which are now writing the new guidelines which is about the tax avoidance. HMRC is also well aware now that this amendments are happening because of UKBA checks so most probably they will start giving you a penalty or might prosecute you over this if your liability will be higher because this comes under the tax avoidance offence which they are taking more seriously as beforeAlILR wrote:Dear all,
I have sent my amendments in July and now they are sitting with compliance.
IS there anyone else who in the same situation i.e. amendments with compliance. And did they gave any date when it will be dealt with?
Tuntuna: do you have any source of this information that HMRC is not amending any tax returns beyond 4 years ? please provide the source of your information.tuntuna wrote:HMRC aint updating any amendment beyond the 4 years time until January because of HMRC has got alerted of this sudden so many amendments request specifically 10/11 and they have escalate this issue to their top bosses which are now writing the new guidelines which is about the tax avoidance. HMRC is also well aware now that this amendments are happening because of UKBA checks so most probably they will start giving you a penalty or might prosecute you over this if your liability will be higher because this comes under the tax avoidance offence which they are taking more seriously as beforeAlILR wrote:Dear all,
I have sent my amendments in July and now they are sitting with compliance.
IS there anyone else who in the same situation i.e. amendments with compliance. And did they gave any date when it will be dealt with?
Thanks bluecandi for sharing this. I am quite sure that HMRC are still doing the amendments for year beyond 4 years including 2010-2011. can you confirm if this is not the case? just for the purpose of other forum members.bluecandi wrote:Tuntuna,
You must have read a post from Tier 1 forum where some uninformed person came up with this version of story. Please next time dont share anything without having a research.
f317633.
If you read the Higgs case on google its because of that they updating their guidelines NOT because of immigration. I had an extensive conversation with someone in authority in HMRC and I CAN CONFIRM YOU THERE IS NOTHING TO DO WITH IMMIGRATION. HMRC IS NON-MINISTERIAL DEPARTMENT AND THEY OPERATE UNDER QUEEN NOT MINISTER.
also, i read that the 4 year window period applies mainly for the repayment where the individual is claiming repayment from HMRC. It does not sound logical that if HMRC receives an amended tax return of even 5-6 years old where they are infact receiving the money from the individual in the form of additional tax plus interest plus penalty and they will reject to process it. I have not seen any government department who does not want to receive the payment due from the individual saying that it is beyond the 4 years window period. yes, I agree that this can be the case for repayments where the can refuse to process the amendment.f317633 wrote:Thanks bluecandi for sharing this. I am quite sure that HMRC are still doing the amendments for year beyond 4 years including 2010-2011. can you confirm if this is not the case? just for the purpose of other forum members.bluecandi wrote:Tuntuna,
You must have read a post from Tier 1 forum where some uninformed person came up with this version of story. Please next time dont share anything without having a research.
f317633.
If you read the Higgs case on google its because of that they updating their guidelines NOT because of immigration. I had an extensive conversation with someone in authority in HMRC and I CAN CONFIRM YOU THERE IS NOTHING TO DO WITH IMMIGRATION. HMRC IS NON-MINISTERIAL DEPARTMENT AND THEY OPERATE UNDER QUEEN NOT MINISTER.
Hi bluecandibluecandi wrote:f31633
I feel angry when some of these new boys in town start giving their opinion on something they dont have a clue about.
Dont worry about amendments it will be done. HMRC has nothing to do with IMMIGRATION. They collect taxes irrespective of nationality and immigration status.
AT THE MOMENT (Higgs Case) HMRC dont give refund if the tax return is beyond 4 years however they will take the payments from anyone even after 10 years. HMRC got a system called Discovery through which they can go back upto 20 years.
ANYONE OF YOU WANTS TO DEBATE HOW HMRC OPERATES SEND ME PM AND WE CAN HAVE CHAT. FOR GOD SAKE STOP POSTING WRONG INFORMATION HERE. THIS IS NOT A VIRTUAL GAMING FORUM.
I see it as a big issue for those who have deliberately provided false tax records for and are now squirming like the proverbial worm on a hook...Killer14bean wrote:Tuntuna,
usually new guidelines in the UK are published with a transition period i.e. phasing out the old policies and phasing in the new ones. Those who have already applied for amendments, they would never fall under the new guidelines even if they come in effect in Jan'16, which is very hard to digest considering HMRC receiving 10-15 applications per day for amendments and linking it to immigration and hence changing the guidelines to punish people who are voluntarily willing to pay money to HMRC just because of inefficient HO case workers who dont understand the complex tax system.
Dont you see this can become a big issue of abusing vulnerable and innocent people?
Well I doubt here if the new policy wont affect to people who already have sent their amendment because if this was the case they would have to dealt it rather then forwarding to compliance, further they are not just bluntly forwarding cases to compliance team firstly they forward the case to relevant tax officer then TO does his calculation and then he forwards it to compliance team for further checks now question is why they forwarding to compliance rather then send the bill collect the money and close the case?Killer14bean wrote:Tuntuna,
usually new guidelines in the UK are published with a transition period i.e. phasing out the old policies and phasing in the new ones. Those who have already applied for amendments, they would never fall under the new guidelines even if they come in effect in Jan'16, which is very hard to digest considering HMRC receiving 10-15 applications per day for amendments and linking it to immigration and hence changing the guidelines to punish people who are voluntarily willing to pay money to HMRC just because of inefficient HO case workers who dont understand the complex tax system.
Dont you see this can become a big issue of abusing vulnerable and innocent people?
Wanderer wrote:I see it as a big issue for those who have deliberately provided false tax records for and are now squirming like the proverbial worm on a hook...Killer14bean wrote:Tuntuna,
usually new guidelines in the UK are published with a transition period i.e. phasing out the old policies and phasing in the new ones. Those who have already applied for amendments, they would never fall under the new guidelines even if they come in effect in Jan'16, which is very hard to digest considering HMRC receiving 10-15 applications per day for amendments and linking it to immigration and hence changing the guidelines to punish people who are voluntarily willing to pay money to HMRC just because of inefficient HO case workers who dont understand the complex tax system.
Dont you see this can become a big issue of abusing vulnerable and innocent people?
Thanks for that love but WFT is a 'panic-quake'?bluecandi wrote:Wanderer wrote:I see it as a big issue for those who have deliberately provided false tax records for and are now squirming like the proverbial worm on a hook...Killer14bean wrote:Tuntuna,
usually new guidelines in the UK are published with a transition period i.e. phasing out the old policies and phasing in the new ones. Those who have already applied for amendments, they would never fall under the new guidelines even if they come in effect in Jan'16, which is very hard to digest considering HMRC receiving 10-15 applications per day for amendments and linking it to immigration and hence changing the guidelines to punish people who are voluntarily willing to pay money to HMRC just because of inefficient HO case workers who dont understand the complex tax system.
Dont you see this can become a big issue of abusing vulnerable and innocent people?
Who cares what you think. You are one of those panic-quakes here. Stop posting irrelevant comments and dont waste our time. This is immigration forum not Tory discussion forum.
No one is saying that, but UKVI will act on information gleaned from HMRC and apply their logic, that's the hole people may find in, innocent or guilty.bluecandi wrote:
Guys who send amendments to HMRC ignore people comments of irrelevant people. Do what you have to do HMRC DONT TAKE INSTRUCTIONS FROM UKBA.
IGNOREDWanderer wrote:No one is saying that, but UKVI will act on information gleaned from HMRC and apply their logic, that's the hole people may find in, innocent or guilty.bluecandi wrote:
Guys who send amendments to HMRC ignore people comments of irrelevant people. Do what you have to do HMRC DONT TAKE INSTRUCTIONS FROM UKBA.
That's an oxymoron. Look it up.bluecandi wrote:IGNOREDWanderer wrote:No one is saying that, but UKVI will act on information gleaned from HMRC and apply their logic, that's the hole people may find in, innocent or guilty.bluecandi wrote:
Guys who send amendments to HMRC ignore people comments of irrelevant people. Do what you have to do HMRC DONT TAKE INSTRUCTIONS FROM UKBA.
Hi Uttam0884,uttam0884 wrote:hi
just 2 week ago i done my amendment within 10 weeks