- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
There is no majority here nor even a fixed quorum;sky_rise wrote:thank you zimba88.
Will there be another opinion on this issue, or does the majority agree?
Thank you ,,
SR
No, the employment does not need to be continuous.n8net wrote:shouldn't the employment be continuous without breaks? or can we make up time simply by adding various employees ?
50. Where the applicant’s last grant of entry clearance or leave was as a Tier (Entrepreneur) Migrant, the jobs must have existed for a total of at least 12 months during the period in which the migrant had leave in that category. This need not consist of 12 consecutive months and the jobs need not exist at the date of application, provided they existed for at least 12 months during the period in which the migrant had leave as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant.
No need for an accountant to have a practice, only his/her valid certificate matters. This is really self explanatorysky_rise wrote:Hello everyone,
I have an urgent question on the accountant that i can use for the purpose of signing documents.
the rules read:
"An original accountant’s letter verifying the net increase in business activity. The
accountant must have a valid licence to practice or practising certificate and must be a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, the Association of Authorised Public Accountants, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, the Institute of Financial Accountants, the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, the Association of International Accountants or the Association of Accounting Technicians."
My accountant has a certificate from ACCA but as such does not have a practice, or any other special license apart from being certified by the ACCA (being a member). He works as a finance executive in another business company. Will his letter be sufficient? Or do i need to find a person who works for particular accounting company and is practicing.
Please advise whether i can use him for the purpose of the visa - singing letters and providing them?
Will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
SR
zimba88, do you mean the ACCA certificate that he has, or "practicing certificate", which he does not have? This is a separate one. thank you in advance for reply.zimba88 wrote:No need for an accountant to have a practice, only his/her valid certificate matters. This is really self explanatorysky_rise wrote:Hello everyone,
I have an urgent question on the accountant that i can use for the purpose of signing documents.
the rules read:
"An original accountant’s letter verifying the net increase in business activity. The
accountant must have a valid licence to practice or practising certificate and must be a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, the Association of Authorised Public Accountants, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, the Institute of Financial Accountants, the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, the Association of International Accountants or the Association of Accounting Technicians."
My accountant has a certificate from ACCA but as such does not have a practice, or any other special license apart from being certified by the ACCA (being a member). He works as a finance executive in another business company. Will his letter be sufficient? Or do i need to find a person who works for particular accounting company and is practicing.
Please advise whether i can use him for the purpose of the visa - singing letters and providing them?
Will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
SR
The wording above says either. no ?sky_rise wrote: zimba88, do you mean the ACCA certificate that he has, or "practicing certificate", which he does not have? This is a separate one. thank you in advance for reply.
Maybe forum members could shed some light on their "issue" with that situation?
Bank statements must be original. Online copies are not acceptedsky_rise wrote: For the T1E extension, do we need to submit ORIGINAL business bank statements, or the online printed copy will satisfy? Will appreciate your guidance.
sorry i have difficulty understanding this wording - whether this is either or both. Basically, is both are needed, i have to leave my current accountant, who has ACCA, and go for an expensive and very time consuming solution - going to the accountancy practice and starting all over! So, if only having ACCA is enough - please confirm, and i will stick with it. if not - i need to act asap as i have to apply for extension next week!zimba88 wrote:The wording above says either. no ?sky_rise wrote: zimba88, do you mean the ACCA certificate that he has, or "practicing certificate", which he does not have? This is a separate one. thank you in advance for reply.
Maybe forum members could shed some light on their "issue" with that situation?
Bank statements must be original. Online copies are not acceptedsky_rise wrote: For the T1E extension, do we need to submit ORIGINAL business bank statements, or the online printed copy will satisfy? Will appreciate your guidance.
Have you ordered a free current appointment report from here http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk//wcfr ... ompanyInfo ? Then the filing history is its on the last pagesky_rise wrote:in the part "evidence you have invested in the UK business" - required "Printout of a Companies House document showing the address of the registered office in the UK, or head office if it has
no registered office, and your name, as it appears on the application form, as a director and a printout of the filing history page..
I am submitting current appointment report for this, the updated company registration certificate with my details. But, printout of the filing history page - when i am in my CH company account, it says they do not show any filings, if they are older than 10 days - please help? it says: "Below are details of WebFiled company data for *********. The items below are for the last 10 days ONLY."
They need both license to practice AND must be a member of ACCA, .. etcsky_rise wrote: sorry i have difficulty understanding this wording - whether this is either or both. Basically, is both are needed, i have to leave my current accountant, who has ACCA, and go for an expensive and very time consuming solution - going to the accountancy practice and starting all over! So, if only having ACCA is enough - please confirm, and i will stick with it. if not - i need to act asap as i have to apply for extension next week!
Current appointment report shows CURRENTLY appointed directors. So if you were appointed within the first six months and your name shows up on the report, it means you have been a director since the appointment day. We all extended with the same documents without any issues.sky_rise wrote: yes i have ordered the report from companies house, it got delivered - but it states recent filing, but it does not state the director (myself) for every year there...
Bank statements must be original. Otherwise the copies must be stamped by your bank and you need to get a letter from your bank confirming that you have a business account.Do we need to order original bank statement from the bank? (they charge me £5.50 per PAGE), or we can print online, bring to the branch and stamp them each page?
Yes, you need to send this for each employee for all the period that you are claiming points.sky_rise wrote:zimba88, many thanks for your knowledgeable replies!
Do we need this form P11?
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... -13-14.pdf
Thank you very much,
SR
Calculate it based on the hourly rate they worked in each week of the year (a year is considered 52 weeks)sky_rise wrote:zimba88, thank you for the guidance- i have requested from the accountant.
Some people i employed full time were on 40 hours a week. When calsulating total hours of employment for them, should i calculate them as 40hours a week, or 30hours a week? They were on permanent full time contract and annual salary based on 40hours. Please advise.
You do this (£18,900 / 52 weeks) / 35 hours = £10.38 your hourly rate. That is what you put on the form.thutmose wrote:I have two on a 18900 (35 hours a week contract)
Hourly rate comes up as 10.38 an hour if i calculate using 35 hours.
But rate comes up as 12.11 if I divide the monthly salary with 130 hours (30 hours cap).
And payslips are just like basic pay £1575 monthly. Do I need to change the payslips?
On the form they ask hourly rate shall I put 12.11 or 10.38?
Thanks