- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Migrants have abused the route, particularly through Ireland, to bring mother, brother, uncle, aunty etc to the UK.sadmanonatrain wrote:What has happened or has been happening in a nutshell for this route to have become more risky and not recommended Casa? Is Ireland a no-go these days then?
This has nothing to do with the leaving the EU. It is UK immigration rules alone and the UK government can decide what to do if they wish to raise it, lower it or make it tougher.sadmanonatrain wrote:I wonder how the, what is essentially a spouse visa for the UK, negotiations are going in regards to the potential lowering of the financial requirement/time needed to be in the job; that half of population can not meet.
I agree with this assessment.gillacious_505 wrote:Having said that the UK is still legally obliged to comply with EU directives and law until it formally exits the Union after invoking the Article 50 of Lisbon Treaty. And that would begin from October 2016 when Cameron resigns. It can take upto 2 years from October for this to happen.
Remain would have triggered the EU-EU deal, which would have made SS more difficult. Leave means that SS, unamended, is still in place for two years. So, ironically, Remain was worse than Leave for SSers in the short-term.sadmanonatrain wrote:So Remain might have been worse for this route?
That is awaiting a ruling from the UK Supreme Court. Nothing to do with with EU, as CR001 said.sadmanonatrain wrote:I wonder how the, what is essentially a spouse visa for the UK, negotiations are going in regards to the potential lowering of the financial requirement/time needed to be in the job; that half of population can not meet.
If all you earn is national minimum wage, then you can meet the requriements by working 49 hours at NMW and you can do more than 1 job to meet this. For the next visa, both of the couples wages can be used to meet the 18.6sadmanonatrain wrote:
I wonder how the, what is essentially a spouse visa for the UK, negotiations are going in regards to the potential lowering of the financial requirement/time needed to be in the job; that half of population can not meet.
Nowhere near 70%khanmzk wrote:70% of UK population fail to achieve this figure.
Additionally, these Rules disproportionately affect women, 55% of whom earn less than £18,600, compared to 27% of men. These Rules also put young people at a disadvantage. 53% of 20-29 year olds would not meet the minimum income requirement as opposed to 36% of people aged 46-60 years old. Finally, those living outside of London are at a disadvantage with, on average, 43% earning less than the income threshold, compared to 27% of Londoners.
In my understanding, free movement derives from membership of EEA. And it is 'only' the EU that UK has decided to leave.sadmanonatrain wrote:We plan on getting into and living in the UK via this route. The likely outcome looks as though the UK will leave. What are the implications specifically to people using this route? If any? I understand it's at least two years for it to come into effect. Will it be status quo for that time period? And what happens after?
I got the consensus that it wont affect it at all months ago? As in it'll be like Switzerland or Norway, as in within the European Economic Area? Or was I misreading?
I appreciate any in depth opinions/facts. Thanks.
This argument has already been made and failed. The counter argument being that the UK citizen can always go live with their spouse in the spouse's country with no restriction.mkhan2525 wrote:I’m sure their entry would be covered under Article 8. This is likely to be the view of the ECJ as the UK will not be withdrawing from the Human Rights Act.
What would the counter argument be? That it is 'humanely' unreasonable to expect the UK spouse to go their spouse's country? I'm not sure how that argument could stand considering the non-UK spouse has got to take the same flight, except in the opposite direction.mkhan2525 wrote:Well that view may change when the Supreme Court gives its judgement on the MM case.
Well you clearly won't have time to come back to UK and reside there for 5 years in order to acquire PR in the regular way.logical_1 wrote:Me and my BC spouse have been resident in Germany for last 3months, I have been issued with a German residence card which is valid for 5 years. Would it be possible for usbto do S.S, are there any risks for us in future?
So, is it safer if we stay in Germany instead??noajthan wrote:Well you clearly won't have time to come back to UK and reside there for 5 years in order to acquire PR in the regular way.logical_1 wrote:Me and my BC spouse have been resident in Germany for last 3months, I have been issued with a German residence card which is valid for 5 years. Would it be possible for usbto do S.S, are there any risks for us in future?
Whatever happens for you will probably depend on any transitional arrangements that may be put in place for those who are still 'in flight' on an EU migration trajectory when the final exit actually occurs.
I can't possibly comment. Depends if you like Germany and Germany likes you.logical_1 wrote:So, is it safer if we stay in Germany instead??
All this is really confusing and affecting us specially when you have children.
S.S aside do you think its better to settle on Germany nowvthat the UK has left the EU?
That will depend on the British sense of fair play and any transitional arrangements that may or may not be put in place. Noone knows.logical_1 wrote:It's quite nice here apart from the language barrier but hopefully that shouldn't be a problem if we plan on staying here.
What if we were to get EEA2 in time before the UK leaves the EU officially.I'm sure people on EEA2's won't be kicked out.