- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
I think the initial decision to revoke his visa was HO error which has now been corrected by a competent court and therefore nullify that decision. I strongly believe that the reason he was not awarded a compensation in this regard is because he never asked for it in his prayers to the court. If HO insists that he has not attained legal 10 years because of their erroneous decision, then they acting against the decision of the court which OP can take back to the court and this time along with his prayers requesting for recognition of the 10 years as legal can also ask for compensation from HO.
This is what I am saying that with these two decisions of the court, the decision of the HO to revoke your Tier 4 visa was in error. I wish you had requested that your Tier 4 visa be restored, it would made simple this perceived legal technicality. But I still believe that by that decision of the court you have been affirmed to be resident legally in UK against HOs initial decision.
Correct. Your FLR related appeal is not relevant. I am interested on the first JR.shawon wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:05 pmAs far as I know judicial review is totally different from tribunal.In the tribunal Home office didn't give me evidence about my English proxy test taker.Judge satisfy my education background and did believe i sat on my exam that day.so in a way Home office make this false allegation against me and revoke my Visa.
Another way if I dont have any FLR FP application if I review my Toeic case at court of appeal if I won.Home office had to reinstall my Visa.
I did not break my 10 years law resident that's home office error made me.