- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Only Property sale proceeds doesn't need to be 6 months older. Read the full guidance about it:RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:46 pmHello seagul
Many thanks for your reply. Are you sure that's the case? If it were some other asset like shares or a house that was liquidated into a current account, then that would be permissable. But liquidating cash into cash, as it were, is not?
Do you know if there is some explicit HO guidance on that or some written rule somewhere? I can't find anything explicit and non-ambiguous anywhere.
Hello Seagul. Yes, I have read that, but it seems to me there's some ambiguity in 7.45 and 7.46 that would permit the method I'm considering.seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:00 pmOnly Property sale proceeds doesn't need to be 6 months older. Read the full guidance about it:RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:46 pmHello seagul
Many thanks for your reply. Are you sure that's the case? If it were some other asset like shares or a house that was liquidated into a current account, then that would be permissable. But liquidating cash into cash, as it were, is not?
Do you know if there is some explicit HO guidance on that or some written rule somewhere? I can't find anything explicit and non-ambiguous anywhere.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... ext_1_.pdf
Have you read the point number 7 on page 52 of it??RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:19 pmHello Seagul. Yes, I have read that, but it seems to me there's some ambiguity in 7.45 and 7.46 that would permit the method I'm considering.seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:00 pmOnly Property sale proceeds doesn't need to be 6 months older. Read the full guidance about it:RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:46 pmHello seagul
Many thanks for your reply. Are you sure that's the case? If it were some other asset like shares or a house that was liquidated into a current account, then that would be permissable. But liquidating cash into cash, as it were, is not?
Do you know if there is some explicit HO guidance on that or some written rule somewhere? I can't find anything explicit and non-ambiguous anywhere.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... ext_1_.pdf
The savings can be immediately withdrawn (with or without penalty)
seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:32 pmHave you read the point number 7 on page 52 of it??RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:19 pmHello Seagul. Yes, I have read that, but it seems to me there's some ambiguity in 7.45 and 7.46 that would permit the method I'm considering.seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:00 pmOnly Property sale proceeds doesn't need to be 6 months older. Read the full guidance about it:RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:46 pmHello seagul
Many thanks for your reply. Are you sure that's the case? If it were some other asset like shares or a house that was liquidated into a current account, then that would be permissable. But liquidating cash into cash, as it were, is not?
Do you know if there is some explicit HO guidance on that or some written rule somewhere? I can't find anything explicit and non-ambiguous anywhere.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... ext_1_.pdf
The savings can be immediately withdrawn (with or without penalty)
Read the whole paragraph at 7.45 in addition to its just first line.RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:42 pmseagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:32 pmHave you read the point number 7 on page 52 of it??RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:19 pmHello Seagul. Yes, I have read that, but it seems to me there's some ambiguity in 7.45 and 7.46 that would permit the method I'm considering.seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:00 pm
Only Property sale proceeds doesn't need to be 6 months older. Read the full guidance about it:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... ext_1_.pdf
The savings can be immediately withdrawn (with or without penalty)
Sure, and 7.45 on page 53 references that table of requirements, but only for, 'Funds that are held in an account at the date of application.'
7.45 doesn't seem to disqualify my situation since my funds are held in an account at the date of application which does meet all the requirements in the table in 7.43. That's part of my confusion.seagul wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:29 pmRead the whole paragraph at 7.45 in addition to its just first line.RT001 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:42 pm
Sure, and 7.45 on page 53 references that table of requirements, but only for, 'Funds that are held in an account at the date of application.'