Read this:
https://freemovement.org.uk/guidance-up ... lications/
Breaches of the lawful residence requirement include illegal entry to the United Kingdom, overstaying, and absconding.
Previously, immigration breaches made in the 5-year period before the submission of a citizenship application may have been grounds for refusal on the basis that the individual did not meet the lawful residence requirement. If the breach was made in the 10-year period before the application was submitted, it could become grounds for refusal on the basis that they did not meet the good character requirement.
The rules have now been amended. Where an individual holds indefinite leave to remain, they can be treated as meeting the lawful residence requirement during the 5-year qualifying period, without further enquiry.
To align with this change, illegal entry, overstaying and absconding may also be disregarded when assessing good character requirements during the relevant 10-year period. But only where all of the following factors apply:
The individual is applying for naturalisation as a British citizen, or registration under s.4(2), 6(1) or 6(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 after 28 June 2022;
The person holds indefinite leave to enter or remain; and
No concerns (for example relating to their character) have arisen since the grant of indefinite leave that might cast doubt on the decision.
It will remain appropriate for some lawful residence breaches to be cosnidered, alongside other good character factors, in certain applications. These may include, but are not limited to:
Where historic information has come to light which, had it been known at the grant of settlement, may have led to refusal
Where something occurred after the grant of settlement to indicate revocation of the status may be appropriate
Applications to naturalise as a British overseas territory citizen
Immigration breaches that do not relate to lawful residence (for example work-related breaches, or failure to observe reporting requirements) must still be considered.
Are there any other factors that might cast doubt on your good character? If the answer is no, you should be OK according to the new rules. If there is any other factor that might cast doubt on your good character, it would be better to wait. Your period of lawful residence started possibly when you applied for a BRC in 2016, so if you have any other concerns relating your good character in the last 10 years, you are better off waiting until 2026.
All advice comes from personal research and experience and should not be regarded as professional opinion.
apply on end of 
2026. OMG after 11 years i can just apply for Citizenship from 1st BRC application not fair at all and it’s 5 years routes 
