- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Thanks for the response John, I get your point, he got refused because we couldn't give details of his ex-wife's employment at the time of the divorce (she wasn't cooperating), but he has been working through the whole time and we showed proof of that.John wrote:Are you able to give any information about why the application for PR was rejected?
What I am thinking is that the strength, or otherwise, of his case, to win the appeal, might dictate which is the better option to choose.
Thank you so much for the prompt reply,John wrote:I shall post in the other topic as regards the appeal, but as I see it, he is legal in this country at the moment, pending the determination of the appeal, and should that appeal fail, until the time for further appealing against that failed appeal has expired.
So I think, at this moment in time, just wait and see how the appeal goes, and of course if the appeal is won, there is no need to make the application on form FLR(M).
But if the appeal is lost, promptly submit the FLR(M) ... which can indeed be done from inside the UK, as he will be "legal" in the UK when the application is made. The submission of the form FLR(M) will further extend the Section 3C protection, and keep him "legal" while that application is considered.
Hi Jonh and everyoneJohn wrote:I shall post in the other topic as regards the appeal, but as I see it, he is legal in this country at the moment, pending the determination of the appeal, and should that appeal fail, until the time for further appealing against that failed appeal has expired.
So I think, at this moment in time, just wait and see how the appeal goes, and of course if the appeal is won, there is no need to make the application on form FLR(M).
But if the appeal is lost, promptly submit the FLR(M) ... which can indeed be done from inside the UK, as he will be "legal" in the UK when the application is made. The submission of the form FLR(M) will further extend the Section 3C protection, and keep him "legal" while that application is considered.
Thanks for the speedy and concise reply John, 2 more questionsJohn wrote:You probably will not appreciate me saying this first part, but it is useful clarification for those wanting to make a similar application to the one your husband made .... it is essential that proof is supplied that the ex-spouse is still exercising EU Treaty Rights in the UK when the divorce is finalised.
Right, looking forward. At this moment the Section 3C protection is still in force, but only until the deadline for further appealing against the dismissal. That is just a few days. So at the moment he is still "legal" in the UK.
Accordingly I suggest you spend this long weekend break preparing a form FLR(M), and applying for a spouse visa. Given the background I suggest you don't apply in person at a PEO, but instead apply by post. If I were you I would now be planning to spend a few minutes on Tuesday morning at the Post Office posting the application by Special Delivery.
You can download the form FLR(M) by going to this UKBA webpage.
I think the evidence you enclose with the application should include the letter received this morning, to which you will attach your own letter stating at as the appeal has only just been dismissed, the Section 3C protection is still in force when this application is made. In view of that, and this further application, the Section 3C protection will continue while the application now made is considered .... the letter should go on to say.
Hope it all works out.
Hello Irakroirakro97 wrote:Hello Swan
I am sorry to hear that your Husband had his appeal refused.
please let me inform you that my brother's appeal was refused as well
we went on the ground that the Judge should follow the EU directive and the HO was mis interpreted the directive in its regulation 2006. as the EU directive does not mentioned anything about the EEA member to have been exercising the right at the time of the divorce.
we are in the process of going to a senior Judge for reconsideration.
could you please provide us with details of the two other cases similar were the EEA member did not give his/her documents and still that the cases were won ?
Please thanks for understanding these can be useful in court
irakro