ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Anyone up for signing a petition for PSW maintaince!!!

Archived UK Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) points system forum. This route no longer exists.

Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2

Locked
sarah_j_attaullah@hotmail
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:19 pm

Anyone up for signing a petition for PSW maintaince!!!

Post by sarah_j_attaullah@hotmail » Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:57 am

I am thinking that if we can sign up for a petition to PM,so that this mainataince rule for PSW can be challenged??????????

Plz inform me of your views......

Regards

Sarah

vinata
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 1:27 pm

Post by vinata » Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:23 pm

My understanding is that only Courts can challenge a paticular rule in this country. At the hearing the arguments are heard from both sides and then the judge will normally make a decision. If he finds in the favour of the appelants, then he may also request the HO to amend this particular rule. However, I don't think that MPs can decide on it in the Parliament, as it is outside the scope of their jurisdiction. Judicial review is probably the only way forward.

Previous HSMP holders have won their settlement rights back by going from one court to other for 3 years, and only judicial review ended this process in March 2009 by the court's rulling that HO requirements were against the human rights act. However, this case is different as this type of visa had a provision of settlement built into it from the very begining. But this is not the case with student visas.

The only argument, I believe, as regards psw maintenance rule, could be that the marginal drop in the day to day balances does not constitute the applicants inability to support himself in the UK without the recourse to public funds, particularly when such an applicant ears over £20,000pa, or he has been in the UK for 5 year or so and didn't claim any benefits in the past, so it consequntly could mean that this applicant should not be refused psw. Therefore, some discretion should be exercised.

Not exercising discretion is against article 6 of human rights act, and all other non-points based applications are entitled to some form of it, but not those which are points based. So, if non-exersing discretion is rulled out to be unlawful by the court, it could be possible for the case workes to be flexible with applications. But at the moment everybody who does not satisfy the rules is refused straight away without taking into consideration all other facts, such as good immigration history or regular income levels.

This is my own view on this problem. It may be different from what others might think.

sarah_j_attaullah@hotmail
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:19 pm

Post by sarah_j_attaullah@hotmail » Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:14 pm

Dear Vinata,

I too believe very much of what you have recommended .It was only that i thought of bringing this point to the attention of the people,who are making this unjustifed rules and then playing with people's future.

Trust me yesterday i met a guy who is a frsh applicant under PSW and not aplying in trasition of IGS.He did not knw this rule and lacking funds for 15 days.He has been in this country for more than 4 yrs and working as well.So he was so worried for this rule and he didnt knew wht to do about it.I advised him if he has other bank acc here and back home in his name ,he could make up.But same prblm that he is only having bank acc here in the UK and anywhere else.

My hearing for reconsideration is next week and i am really thinkin to make a very strong grounds for the hearing.In my first hearing i hired a lawyer but nothg happened and i ended up paying money with no results.

This time i am thinkin to work thgs out on my own and i am tryin to get a good lawyer as well.So lets C.....

But thankyou so much for your really helpful replys.

Takecare

ash786
BANNED
Posts: 947
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:57 pm

Post by ash786 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:34 pm

sarah_j_attaullah@hotmail wrote:Dear Vinata,

I too believe very much of what you have recommended .It was only that i thought of bringing this point to the attention of the people,who are making this unjustifed rules and then playing with people's future.

Trust me yesterday i met a guy who is a frsh applicant under PSW and not aplying in trasition of IGS.He did not knw this rule and lacking funds for 15 days.He has been in this country for more than 4 yrs and working as well.So he was so worried for this rule and he didnt knew wht to do about it.I advised him if he has other bank acc here and back home in his name ,he could make up.But same prblm that he is only having bank acc here in the UK and anywhere else.

My hearing for reconsideration is next week and i am really thinkin to make a very strong grounds for the hearing.In my first hearing i hired a lawyer but nothg happened and i ended up paying money with no results.

This time i am thinkin to work thgs out on my own and i am tryin to get a good lawyer as well.So lets C.....

But thankyou so much for your really helpful replys.

Takecare
The guidence is clear about the maintenance and if follows then application is successful and if not then problem.

wait
- thin ice -
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 2:17 pm
Location: London,England

Post by wait » Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:09 pm

everyone knows that what was new in ur article?

Locked