- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
They haven't ruined your career, you can study in another country if needs be.sunny07 wrote:evabeva.....i was refused under 320 7A too it doesnt say ban but 370 20B does! thats wot haas happened....if i was aware before then i wud never ever applied a fresh application but hell with my solicitor who misguided and ruin my carrer just for their bloody fees, please somebody help me wot shud i do i have to apply for admin review
Someone with more experience will no doubt give you more detail about what to do, but as long as your uncle had the funds in his account then there is nothing wrong. You didn't apply to one of the colleges that was suspended did you?sunny07 wrote:meats, that time before March 2009 there was no such rule, as we cud show them the statements , infact they did verified the bank too and then they called uncle...which made all confusion, and yes the point u raised is very important and i have thought about this as well, that i shud clear them that money was in "bank which they admitted too" and then eco also admitted that ur "uncle was willing to sponsor me" the only thing that claim is that he cud not answer abt "the course name and college and dont know anything about me" is controversial, so if they say "he was willing to sponsor me" then their all claims are useless, and yes i shud tell them that he was my real uncle and at that time i submitted my mothers id and Uncles`s id with visa file which shows D/O and S/O one person, and they are real brother and sister, i think i shud resubmit this thing again with admin review? and i hope they dont say im sending extra documents with admin review....
and as u sid i can go to some other country, but dont u think after 10 year ban every country is going to see me as something very alien...as 10 year ban is not a small issue , it raises many questions....but answers and the real facts behind are so silly?
They only applied the 320 7A rule on my case, no-where on the refusal I had 320 7B, does it still mean that since I was refused under 320 7A, automatically the rule 320 7B is applied too!sunny07 wrote:evabeva.....i was refused under 320 7A too it doesnt say ban but 370 20B does! thats wot haas happened....if i was aware before then i wud never ever applied a fresh application but hell with my solicitor who misguided and ruin my carrer just for their bloody fees, please somebody help me wot shud i do i have to apply for admin review
I think 10 years is too much !! Is really utterly stupid of them to impose such a rule...sunny07 wrote:meats, that time before March 2009 there was no such rule, as we cud show them the statements , infact they did verified the bank too and then they called uncle...which made all confusion, and yes the point u raised is very important and i have thought about this as well, that i shud clear them that money was in "bank which they admitted too" and then eco also admitted that ur "uncle was willing to sponsor me" the only thing that claim is that he cud not answer abt "the course name and college and dont know anything about me" is controversial, so if they say "he was willing to sponsor me" then their all claims are useless, and yes i shud tell them that he was my real uncle and at that time i submitted my mothers id and Uncles`s id with visa file which shows D/O and S/O one person, and they are real brother and sister, i think i shud resubmit this thing again with admin review? and i hope they dont say im sending extra documents with admin review....
and as u sid i can go to some other country, but dont u think after 10 year ban every country is going to see me as something very alien...as 10 year ban is not a small issue , it raises many questions....but answers and the real facts behind are so silly?
If he's a genuine student, as it appears, then yes it is very harsh. However the rule was put in place because of the fake students exploiting the system and working full time instead of studying. Unfortunately innocent people have become victims because of the minority.evabeva wrote:I think 10 years is too much !! Is really utterly stupid of them to impose such a rule...sunny07 wrote:meats, that time before March 2009 there was no such rule, as we cud show them the statements , infact they did verified the bank too and then they called uncle...which made all confusion, and yes the point u raised is very important and i have thought about this as well, that i shud clear them that money was in "bank which they admitted too" and then eco also admitted that ur "uncle was willing to sponsor me" the only thing that claim is that he cud not answer abt "the course name and college and dont know anything about me" is controversial, so if they say "he was willing to sponsor me" then their all claims are useless, and yes i shud tell them that he was my real uncle and at that time i submitted my mothers id and Uncles`s id with visa file which shows D/O and S/O one person, and they are real brother and sister, i think i shud resubmit this thing again with admin review? and i hope they dont say im sending extra documents with admin review....
and as u sid i can go to some other country, but dont u think after 10 year ban every country is going to see me as something very alien...as 10 year ban is not a small issue , it raises many questions....but answers and the real facts behind are so silly?
As if you were a criminal or a rapist lool
I think this rule should be overturned
So did they actually wrote to you on paper that u were banned for 10 years?
Ok I understand but since "yesterday" HO were just being willingly "blind" and "today" they just suddenly woke up and are screwing up things...meats wrote:If he's a genuine student, as it appears, then yes it is very harsh. However the rule was put in place because of the fake students exploiting the system and working full time instead of studying. Unfortunately innocent people have become victims because of the minority.evabeva wrote:I think 10 years is too much !! Is really utterly stupid of them to impose such a rule...sunny07 wrote:meats, that time before March 2009 there was no such rule, as we cud show them the statements , infact they did verified the bank too and then they called uncle...which made all confusion, and yes the point u raised is very important and i have thought about this as well, that i shud clear them that money was in "bank which they admitted too" and then eco also admitted that ur "uncle was willing to sponsor me" the only thing that claim is that he cud not answer abt "the course name and college and dont know anything about me" is controversial, so if they say "he was willing to sponsor me" then their all claims are useless, and yes i shud tell them that he was my real uncle and at that time i submitted my mothers id and Uncles`s id with visa file which shows D/O and S/O one person, and they are real brother and sister, i think i shud resubmit this thing again with admin review? and i hope they dont say im sending extra documents with admin review....
and as u sid i can go to some other country, but dont u think after 10 year ban every country is going to see me as something very alien...as 10 year ban is not a small issue , it raises many questions....but answers and the real facts behind are so silly?
As if you were a criminal or a rapist lool
I think this rule should be overturned
So did they actually wrote to you on paper that u were banned for 10 years?
Ok, sorry to hear that you have actually received this ban under paragraph 320 7B. On my case they just applied 320 7A rule. Maybe because I left within 28 days and before October 2008.sunny07 wrote:
ya they have written on the refusal letter that he belives that i come under 320 7b and all my future applications will be refused
sunny07 wrote:AH! i thought that someone here would guide me but i dont know everybody gets mean when we need somebody at a time of need...
I have submitted my admin review by dhl to abu dhabi today with all supportive material and rejecting the clauses that these does not apply on me attached all the information about my uncle, that on wot day he was called during my last application, wot questions did they ask and wot he replied etc, i hope they show their sympathy on me this time